Predictions

October 14, 2007

Pats will go undefeated

Time to go out on a limb and make an outrageous prediction: The Patriots are a cold-blooded bunch of assassins, and I don't think they're going to lose in 2007.

That is to say: Barring outrageous misfortune and injury, they'll go undefeated and win the Super Bowl.

They've got a Hall of Fame quarterback, the best receivers, a veteran defensive unit, a stellar offensive line, good special teams and a methodical, supremely confident style. They beat the NFC's best team today by 21 points, their narrowest margin of victory in 2007 is 17 points and the really scary thing is, the numbers lie: None of those games were actually that close.

Our best chances of stopping them -- and by "our" I mean "the rest of the world" -- are Nov. 4 at Indianapolis and the Steelers' Dec. 9 visit to Foxboro. If that doesn't get it done, we're down to the New York Giants in Week 17, playing against a New England team that will have sewn up its playoff seeding. And that's it. Nobody else has a shot.

Yes, it's ridiculously early to say this, but I don't believe this team is going to lose. It's been 35 years since a pro football team went undefeated, but that's not to say it's never going to happen again.

In fact, it's going to happen in 2007. This is the greatest team since the 1985 Bears,  and they're en route to laying claim to the title: Greatest of  All Time.

September 06, 2007

2007 NFL Predictions

AFC
North: (Dan: Bears)
South: (Dan: Saints)
East:(Dan: Cowboys)
West: (Dan: Seahawks)
Wild Card: (Dan: Eagles)
Wild Card: (Dan: 49ers)
Home field: (Dan: Bears)
Conference champion: (Dan: Bears)

NFC
North: (Dan: Ravens)
South: (Dan: Colts)
East: (Dan: Patriots)
West: (Dan: Chargers)
Wild Card: (Dan: Steelers)
Wild Card: (Dan: Jaguars)
Home field: (Dan: Chargers)
Conference champion: (Dan: Chargers)

Super Bowl: Chargers 31, Bears 23 (Dan)

August 02, 2007

Gut check: The Top 50

Ranks based on recent Average Draft Position results...

1. LaDainian Tomlinson, RB, San Diego. His numbers could go down by a third and LT would still be the No. 1 player in fantasy. That's just sick.
2. Steven Jackson, RB, St. Louis. He deserves this ranking, but he's nowhere close to Tomlinson and probably won't produce like last year's No. 2.
3. Larry Johnson, RB, Kansas City. I expect a big decline here: Kansas City is rebuilding, the O-line is cheesecloth, the QB is likely to be Brodie Croyle, and LJ, coming off another punishing year, is holding out of training camp. He's already dropping in recent expert drafts and that trend could continue.
4. Frank Gore, RB, San Francisco. The situation is great, the player had a breakout year in 2006 ... and something about this scares me. Gore is playing on rebuilt bionic knees and just broke his hand, which means he'll enter September a little rusty. Again, not specific -- just a bad feeling.
5. Shaun Alexander, RB, Seattle. If I can get him at six, seven or eight, I'd feel pretty good about the value. Alexander is in decline, but he can still be good in spurts, and he's reported to camp in great shape.

Continue reading "Gut check: The Top 50" »

October 28, 2006

Old predictions, trends

2004 Predictions

NFC
North

Vikings: 12-4 predicted, 8-8 actual, -4 difference, finish 2nd
Packers; 9-7 predicted, 10-6 actual, +1 difference, finish 1st
Bears: 7-9 predicted, 5-11 actual, -2 difference, finish 4th
Lions: 6-10 predicted, 6-10 actual, HIT, finish 3rd

South
Panthers: 9-7 predicted, 7-9 actual, -2 difference, finish 3rd
Saints: 9-7 predicted, 8-8 actual, -1 difference, finish 2nd
Falcons: 7-9 predicted, 11-5 actual, +4 difference, finish 1st
Bucs: 6-10 predicted, 5-11 actual, -1 difference, finish 4th HIT

East (yes)
Eagles: 12-4 predicted, 13-3 actual, +1 difference, finish 1st HIT
Cowboys: 8-8 predicted, 6-10 actual, -2 difference, finish tie 2nd
Redskins: 7-9 predicted, 6-10 actual, -1 difference, finish tie 2nd
Giants: 5-11 predicted, 6-10 actual, +1 difference, finish tie 2nd

West (yes)
Seahawks: 12-4 predicted, 9-7 actual, -3 difference, finish 1st HIT
Rams: 6-10 predicted, 8-8 actual, +2 difference, finish 2nd HIT
Arizona: 4-12 predicted, 6-10 actual, +2 difference, finish 3rd HIT
49ers: 4-12 predicted, 2-14 actual, -2 difference, finish 4th HIT

AFC
North

Ravens: 10-6 predicted, 9-7 actual, -1 difference, finish 2nd
Bengals: 10-6 predicted, 8-8 actual, -2 difference, finish 3rd
Steelers: 7-9 predicted, 15-1 actual, +8 difference, finish 1st
Browns: 4-12 predicted, 4-12 actual, HIT, finish 4th HIT

South
Titans: 10-6 predicted, 5-11 actual, -5 difference, finish 4th
Colts: 10-6 predicted, 12-4 actual, +2 difference, finish 1st
Jaguars: 9-7 predicted, 9-7 actual, HIT, finish 2nd
Houston: 8-8 predicted, 7-9 actual, -1 difference, finish 3rd

East
Jets: 11-5 predicted, 10-6 actual, -1 difference, finish 2nd
Patriots: 10-6 predicted, 14-2 actual, +4 difference, finish 1st
Bills: 6-10 predicted, 9-7 actual, +3 difference, finish 3rd
Dolphins: 3-13 predicted, 4-12 actual, +1 difference, finish 4th HIT

West
Chiefs: 10-6 predicted, 7-9 actual, -3 difference, finish 3rd
Raiders: 8-8 predicted, 5-11 actual, -3 difference, finish 4th
Broncos: 7-9 predicted, 10-6 actual, +3 difference, finish 2nd
Chargers: 2-14 predicted, 12-4 actual, +10 difference, finish 1st

Findings:

  1. My average prediction was 2.97 games off, which is to say that my margin of error is roughly 19 percent across a 16-game schedule.
  2. Thirteen of my 32 record predictions (40 percent) were within one game of the actual results. Only three were hits.
  3. I tended to over-estimate performances. Of the 29 team records that were incorrectly predicted, I projecting extra wins for 16 of them. Despite this optimism, when I missed I missed big, actually registering an under-over ratio of +8 games.
  4. I was terrible at picking division winners, picking only two of eight (25 percent) correctly. I was much better at picking 4th-place teams, getting that right in five of the eight divisions.
  5. I was not good at predicting whether teams would finish with winning or losing records: If you count a hit as a match between a prediction of a winning or a losing season and the actual outcome, I got just 18 (56 percent) correct, just slightly ahead of random chance.
  6. I seriously underestimate the performance of eventual division winners, who are about 3.4 games better than I thought they'd be.
  7. My predicted division winners are predictably over estimated in terms of wins, requiring an average adjustment of -2.25 games.

Now let's compare that to how I did in 2005...

Continue reading "Old predictions, trends" »

September 07, 2006

Divisional picks

What do I know about football? I haven't gotten all the games in a single week right since I did it one time in 1986. But what can I say? I like predictions.

 

AFC East: Patriots, Dolphins, Bills, Jets
AFC North: Steelers, Ravens, Bengals, Browns
AFC South: Colts, Jaguars, Titans, Texans
AFC West:
Broncos, Chargers, Chiefs, Raiders

NFC East: Eagles, Cowboys, Giants, Redskins
NFC North: Bears, Vikings, Lions, Packers
NFC South:
Panthers, Buccaneers, Falcons, Saints
NFC West: Seahawks, Cardinals, Rams, 49ers

AFC wild cards: Chargers, Bengals
NFC wild cards:
Buccaneers, Cowboys

AFC playoffs
Wild card: Bengals over Patriots; Pittsburgh over Chargers 
Division: Colts over Pittsburgh; Broncos over Bengals
Championship:
Colts over Broncos 

NFC playoffs
Wild card:
Eagles over Buccaneers; Panthers over Cowboys
Division: Bears over Panthers; Buccaneers over Eagles
Championship: Bears over Eagles

Super Bowl
Bears over Colts

(Originally posted on Xark! on Sept. 7, 2006)

FFB GEAR

Tip Jar

Fantasy Karma!

Tip Jar