Stephanie E. Yuhl: A Golden Haze of Memory: The Making of Historic Charleston
Thomas Frank: What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America
Thomas E. Ricks: Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq
Thomas A. Desjardin: These Honored Dead: How The Story Of Gettysburg Shaped American Memory
Richard D. Porcher: A Guide to the Wildflowers of South Carolina
James Hillman: The Soul's Code: In Search of Character and Calling
Bruno Bettelheim: The Uses of Enchantment: The Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales
Lynne McTaggart: The Field: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe
William Irwin Thompson: The Time Falling Bodies Take to Light
William Greider: Who Will Tell The People?: The Betrayal Of American Democracy
Jerry Bledsoe: Death by Journalism? One Teacher's Fateful Encounter with Political Correctness
edited by Kristina Borjesson: Into the Buzzsaw: Leading Journalists Expose the Myth of a Free Press
« Two weeks of cartoons | Main | The (over-)Thinking Man's Guide to Dr. Horrible »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5d3453ef00e553c9d7c78833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Newspaper Industry Meltdown:
» The Newspaper Industry Meltdown from A Blog Around The Clock
Dan drew this (click here to see big): Explains why Siegel is utterly wrong. Related...... [Read More]
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Love it!
Posted by: Heather | Saturday, August 02, 2008 at 11:38
Holy hell if that isn't the most awesome thing I've seen in awhile.
Bravo!
Posted by: newscoma | Saturday, August 02, 2008 at 12:06
Great explanation. Is there any way newspapers can be a vibrant part of our media or are things too far gone?
Posted by: Vera | Saturday, August 02, 2008 at 19:42
I don't think it's too late at all. In fact, newspapers have all sorts of things going for them in this new information economy, and the smart ones are going to figure out how to leverage what they have and will do just fine.
The hard part for many of them (and I get the daily Romanesko e-mail that talks about all the newspaper industry gossip/buzz/zeitgeist, so I can say this with some conviction) is that there are very few top executives who understand what's happening, and very few corporate boards that will be able to explain to stockholders that the days of monopoly profits are over.
The newspapers that will survive (and in isolated cases, thrive) will be the ones whose executives adapt to the notion that 7 percent profit is an excellent year, and you take your 5 percent profit years without eating your seed corn.
But there will be a deep shakeout over the next 12 to 18 months. By the time it's over, we'll be on our way to building the world's first non-advertising-subsidized information economy. Which should be interesting, to say the least.
Posted by: Daniel | Saturday, August 02, 2008 at 23:18
Dan, this is genius. Total genius!
Posted by: geofftech | Sunday, August 03, 2008 at 01:47
newspapers are no loss at all. look at the pile of unread ones in the house. look at the junk journalism of even the best (invade iraq cheerleaders). look at the celebrity gossip. look at what makes the news and what is left out. look at the status quo mindset and value system that works to keep people in a particular mindset about the world.
Posted by: gregorylent | Sunday, August 03, 2008 at 05:03
Great, Dan.
(And would you care to hazard a guess as to which papers will survive/even thrive?)
Posted by: Peg | Monday, August 04, 2008 at 13:46
My big concern is this: what will we line cat cages with at the Feral Cat Coalition once all the newspapers fold?
Posted by: Huffman | Thursday, August 07, 2008 at 20:05