XARK 3.0

  • Xark began as a group blog in June 2005 but continues today as founder Dan Conover's primary blog-home. Posts by longtime Xark authors Janet Edens and John Sloop may also appear alongside Dan's here from time to time, depending on whatever.

Xark media


  • ALIENS! SEX! MORE ALIENS! AND DUBYA, TOO! Handcrafted, xarky science fiction, lovingly typeset for your home printer!

  • XARK TV

  • XARKAGANDA

  • XARKTOONS
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2005

Statcounter has my back

« It gets better... another SoaP song | Main | In a word: Truthiness »

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Daniel

I think it's a great idea. We've had several innocent people killed by accidents caused by high-speed chases here.

In fact, I want to give patrol officers more high-tech documentation tools, not less of them. Why? Because if done properly, such tools would increase civil liberties, not restrict them.

Innocent until proven guilty? NOT IN TRAFFIC COURT. Not today. But because the issue is trival and abuses are rare, it's not a big deal. Of course, it wasn't trivial to me when I was charged with a traffic violation I didn't commit, then had to miss a day of work and drive four hours round trip to fight the ticket (unsuccessfully) in court -- based on no evidence beyond the cop saying that I was the same driver he witnessed speeding on the Interstate minutes earlier and miles away.

Planted evidence? Manipulated confessions? He-said-she-said? Use technology to document, and make the technology transparent. That's how you get better justice. "Trust Us" doesn't work for journalism anymore, and the same standards should be applied to law enforcement.

Show your work.

The comments to this entry are closed.