XARK 3.0

  • Xark began as a group blog in June 2005 but continues today as founder Dan Conover's primary blog-home. Posts by longtime Xark authors Janet Edens and John Sloop may also appear alongside Dan's here from time to time, depending on whatever.

Xark media

  • ALIENS! SEX! MORE ALIENS! AND DUBYA, TOO! Handcrafted, xarky science fiction, lovingly typeset for your home printer!



Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 06/2005

Statcounter has my back

« I know this looks bad, but... | Main | 33 practical video tips from a pro »

Monday, February 05, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


to clarify: Do you think it's morally reprehensible that a forty-something woman would have an affair with one of her high school students?


Ab-so-friggn-lutely. Especially when the kid is 15, but regardless. Bad Bad Bad.(I'm guessing your question is a joke). But there's a lot of behavior in this film that's morally reprehensible. Indeed, other viewers, including my Bonnie, think it's morally reprehensible that the film uses the predatory-lesbian-vampire stereotype in the film. So much to discuss with this film.


No joke. "Morally reprehensible" is one of those phrases around which "a great gulf is affixed." To say that something is morally reprehensible is to wall it off as beyond consideration. So when anyone says that something is morally reprehensible, I want to poke at that thing, to find out why one thing is a cardinal sin and another thing isn't so bad. I mean, if you really get down to it, homicide isn't even morally reprehensible the way most people view it.

As in: When it comes to sexual affairs, what are the non-morally reprehensible ages and gender combinations? Is it different if it's older man and younger girl? What if it's 25-year-old woman and 15-year-old boy? What if the boy is 16? Does it matter if he's 17? Or 18? Why?


While there are of course all types of ways in which morals/values operate in shades, and while I would be willing to engage in conversations about those gradations, I stand by the fact that the affair in this film is morally reprehensible and walled off. Forgetting the age difference for a second, this was a student in her class. What makes this morally reprehensible is not only the fact that the job DISALLOWS such behaviors (she would have had to agree to that condition to take the job), but that the parents of the child send the kid to the school with the implied guarantee that such behavior will not happen. It's the break of faith/trust that is the reprehensible part.

It is on similar grounds that I think almost any perjury, or lying under oath, is morally reprehensible regardless of the lie told (e.g., if we assume that Clinton perjured himself about sex, it is the perjury that would be the reprehensible part of the equation more so than the sex). If we agree to live together as a nation, there are indeed certain norms that we have to agree to whether you take them to be Moral Laws, good ideas, or inconvenient agreements.


I'll buy that.

The comments to this entry are closed.