We're breaking turnout records all over the country. CNN says it might be the highest turnout since 1908 (Taft, for those of you wondering).
Our day began with a 3-hour, 15-minute wait to vote, and this comment from the only other gray-haired white guy in the line, who overheard Janet telling someone that our 18-year-old son Lee had just voted for Obama: "That figures," the guy told us: "He hasn't done nothing, so he votes for a guy who hasn't done nothing."
Why this rude idiot felt it necessary to chime in with that opinion remains beyond me, but everyone else in the line just politely ignored him, without a single scary Black Panther in sight.
FiveThirtyEight calls it 349-189 for Obama:
Josh Marshall on What to Look For Tonight:
The crux of the matter, it seems to me, is that everything gets engulfed by the internet. For example, I watch a lot of TV programming and read a lot of print media material online. One of the most moving radio ads I've heard this year was a spot by bluegrass legend Ralph Stanley, which I found on the web.
As the NYT article says: "We should be careful of these zero-sum games where the new media drives out the old," said Andrew Heyward, a former president of CBS News who consults for the Monitor Group. "I think what we see is growing sophistication about making the channels work together effectively."
You might think, perhaps hope, that Republicans will engage in some soul-searching, that they’ll ask themselves whether and how they lost touch with the national mainstream. But my prediction is that this won’t happen any time soon.
Jon Taplin, again:
Given that the rise of Barack Obama will have reached a milestone, but the fall of savage capitalism will continue–we will need nothing less than revolutionary innovation from our next President and his transition team starting on November 5th.
Josh Marshall, again:
The conventional wisdom seems to be that only the conservative 'intellectuals' have a beef with Palin. But I'm pretty sure the post-election view is going to seem very different. The chatter out of the McCain campaign only confirms what her two months on the public stage has made painfully clear. Palin wasn't simply unprepared for intense scrutiny of a national campaign. The woman is an ignoramus of almost unprecedented magnitude in the annals of national politics. It's not just that virtually every-non-Republican has a negative view of her. I just don't see a national party getting behind someone like that. And before you snark, "What about George Bush?" Sorry but there's no comparison. Whatever else I think of him, he's not a moron. And while he appears to be astoundingly incurious, there's simply no comparison to Palin.
I guess I could imagine a rump Republican party nominating Palin. It could be Palin with perhaps Mark Levin as veep to nail down the all important angry, middle-aged DC Jewish male, right-wing ravanchist vote and Joe the Plumber to run her Phalangist paramilitary. But my strong hunch is that if McCain loses tomorrow that will be the end of Sarah Palin's national political career even if there are some persistent twitches and jerks over the coming months.
Paul Krugman, again:
There will be endless bloviating over the significance of today’s results; I plan to do some bloviating myself. But we shouldn’t ignore the importance of chance events, or at least the chance timing of events. Without 9/11, what would have become of George W. Bush? My guess is that he would have lost Congress in 2002 and the White House in 2004. And what would have happened if Lehman had waited until November to blow up? Would smear-and-fear have worked?
Nathaniel Missildine: AN ELECTORAL-COLLEGE BREAKDOWN FOR MY FRENCH IN-LAWS THAT MEETS ALL THEIR PRECONCEPTIONS:
And finally, Consuela from Afrogeek Mom & Dad:
It's all so corny and every black person has a million of these stories, but it's still so true. The women who helped raise me had such simple, yet profound, dreams for me and for themselves--to vote, to ride in a big boat, to marry someone I love rather than someone who can take care of me--that it seems almost unbelievable that I got to vote for a major party black candidate for president this morning. These women cleaned white people's houses all their lives and never did get to see that I grew up to be a college professor and the first black women to do a lot of things (a surprising number of things, really, considering that I was born in 1973, not 1903). But I hope they were watching somewhere this morning as I took their great-great-granddaughter into vote.
Amen. Amen. Amen.
Great post, nice roundup. Sorry you had to deal with an a-hole.
Should be an interesting night!
Posted by: Jeff Tompkins | Tuesday, November 04, 2008 at 17:49
lol
ahh South Carolina
he must of have been a smiley when he was my age
Posted by: Lee | Tuesday, November 04, 2008 at 20:55